Ferizaj

Discussion

Across the paper, the figures converge on a consistent diagnosis: Ferizaj is a negotiated urban organism shaped by infrastructural discipline, radial movement, and incremental peripheral growth. Its railway and arterial system provide strong directional structure, while parcel-based expansion produces high orientation entropy, weak orbital connectivity, and discontinuous lateral movement. Morphologically, the city has strong spokes but an incomplete ring: radial corridors pull movement toward the center, while peripheral districts remain weakly connected to each other.

The strongest urban energy, measured through accessibility, movement, mapped services, density, and visibility proxies, is concentrated in the center. Closeness, betweenness, the space-syntax-inspired integration proxy, service-accessibility surface, and desire-line simulations all point toward the same condition: Ferizaj functions through a compact core and a limited number of radial corridors. This creates intensity, but also dependency. Without orbital alternatives, cross-city movement is repeatedly pulled back through the center.

The railway remains the founding infrastructure, but its urban interface remains limited and fragmented. It is present as a line, seam, and memory, yet underdeveloped as a civic edge. This makes the railway corridor one of the most important future design opportunities.

Architectural and Urban Planning Findings

This study does not propose a final masterplan for Ferizaj. Instead, it identifies spatial conditions that can guide future architectural, urban-design, and municipal planning decisions.

Conclusion

Ferizaj's morphology reveals a city of concentrated energy and uneven distribution. Its core is intense, integrated, and rich in mapped services, while its periphery remains fragmented by weak connectivity, larger blocks, incomplete frontage, and uneven mapped access to everyday services.

The research identifies the city's main challenge as redistribution. Future growth should not only add density, but also produce connective tissue: smaller blocks, stronger orbital links, active frontage, local service clusters, and civic spaces along infrastructural corridors.

The railway, once the origin of Ferizaj's urban life, can again become a structuring device, not only as infrastructure, but as public realm. A next phase of research should pair this computational diagnosis with field observation, local planning documents, and stakeholder knowledge, testing where orbital links, frontage repair, service redistribution, and railway-edge public spaces could be most realistically implemented.

Methodological Limitations & Data Notes

All spatial data derive primarily from OpenStreetMap, using an approximate 2025 extract. Core areas are generally complete, but peripheral informal zones may have lower coverage or require manual validation. The study does not incorporate building heights or floor-area ratios, so recent vertical intensification in the core is inferred from footprint changes, satellite evidence, and density proxies rather than direct volumetric quantification.

The fixed 2.5 km radius window captures the majority of Ferizaj's continuously built-up urban area, but boundary effects influence peripheral metrics such as Voronoi territory sizes and block permeability gradients. The measurements in this study should be read as diagnostic urban indicators, not as final planning conclusions. They reveal patterns of irregularity, accessibility, movement pressure, territorial inequality, visibility, and frontage continuity within the study window.

Service-accessibility results should be interpreted as an open-data accessibility proxy rather than a complete commercial or institutional census. The service surface is based on an expanded OpenStreetMap POI extraction, and the conservative 15-minute walking threshold is used as an accessibility proxy, not as a claim that the entire 2.5 km study radius is walkable in 15 minutes.

Publication

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20076658

Download PDF

Recommended citation: Berisha, E. (2026). Ferizaj: The Radial-Linear Organism. A Computational Urban Morphology Study (Version 1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20076658

References

Batty, M. (2013). The New Science of Cities. MIT Press.

Boeing, G. (2017). OSMnx: New methods for acquiring, constructing, analyzing, and visualizing complex street networks. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 65, 126–139.

Boeing, G. (2019). Urban spatial order: Street network orientation, configuration, and entropy. Applied Network Science, 4, 67.

Elezi, K., & Sadiki, A. (2019). Architectural reflection in Ferizaj: from Eclecticism to the new vawe [sic] of Modernism. UBT International Conference, 244.

Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press.

Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House.

K. u. k. Militär-geographisches Institut. (1898). 39°42° Skoplje [Map]. Univerzita Karlova v Praze.

Kosovo Agency of Statistics. (2024). Population census data for Ferizaj Municipality. Kosovo Agency of Statistics.

Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. MIT Press.

Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the "15-Minute City": Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart Cities, 4(1), 93–111.

OpenStreetMap contributors. (2025). OpenStreetMap data for Ferizaj, Kosovo. Retrieved via Overpass API.

Collins, G. R., Flores, C., Soria y Mata, A., & Soria y Puig, A. (1968). Arturo Soria y la Ciudad Lineal. Madrid: Revista de Occidente.

Trancik, R. (1986). Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

USGS. (2024). Landsat Collection 2 Level-2 Science Products. Retrieved through Google Earth Engine.

USGS EarthExplorer. (n.d.). Declassified CORONA satellite imagery. United States Geological Survey.